Esquire Theme by Matthew Buchanan
Social icons by Tim van Damme

18

Jun

So, I’m taking a short, non-credit course at the local community college on writing and publication. And I’m kind of freaking out because I’m supposed to bring 5 pages of my writing, and all I have is old high school projects, Pokemon fan fiction, and a fan fic of the RPG group I was in that I literally started last night and I’m reallly freaking out because the professor is a published author and the two other tsudents are experienced poets and I alreadly think Il ook like an immature moron and I don’t know whow to do dhis. And m yspelling is sucking. I just misspelled spelling damn it \

what crap do i give them?

yuur-guardian-angel:

Things Harry Potter Actors say

(Source: kitten-burrito)

lexyeevee:

whatwhiteswillneverknow:

FBI Uniform Crime Report Hate Crime Statistics, 2011

hold up i have two problems with this argument

(and i do mean “argument”, i.e. i am not commenting on whether i agree or disagree with the conclusion)

  1. the hypothesis is given as “hate crimes against white people are not racism”, but the conclusion is about frequency. what do you think “racism” means, then? is it not racism if it happens less often?

    the social justice answer is of course “yes”, because SJ defines racism as an institutional problem, whereas the word colloquially applies just as well on an individual level. but without emphasizing the distinction, arguing numbers doesn’t mean anything.

    also it strikes me as rude to suggest that someone’s experience doesn’t matter just because that experience is uncommon. speaking of which…

  2. the focus on the black and white dots misses a severe statistical problem here: the Indian and Asian/Pacific areas are even smaller than the white areas. does that mean those groups do not experience racism, or also deserve a stock photo of a crying person?

    of course not, because they represent relatively tiny slices of the entire population. 0.8%, in fact. but they are the target of 1.9% of racially-motivated crimes. so they are earning 2½ times the racial scorn than they should, if it were evenly distributed.

    that is, you have not taken into account that the sizes of the populations are not equal. the percentages of racially-motivated crimes targeted towards each particular race are, on their own, completely meaningless. what you actually want is a relative count of how many people of a particular race were the target of such crimes. going off 2010 US demographics (close enough) and your numbers cited here, and counting hispanic people as white or black as i assume the FBI also did, that gives me the following, in incidents per one million people:

    • 67.4 – black
    • 23.8 – native american/alaskan
    • 21.1 – multiracial
    • 11.5 – asian, pacific islander
    • 2.66 – white

    that paints a much more accurate picture. it also makes your point far more effectively: an asian person is more than four times as likely to experience a racial crime as a white person. a black person, twenty-five times.

    note that i phrased this deliberated as “a person is X likely to experience”, because that’s what matters. you can’t talk about proportions here, because they are meaningless. consider: “i wear polka-dot socks half the time”. what does that tell you about how i feel about those socks? you don’t know without more information. what if i own only one pair of polka-dot socks and twenty pairs of striped socks? what if i own nothing but polka-dot socks?

    (i really don’t like seeing bad math used to make a point, even when the point is ultimately correct. it trains people to believe bad math in the future—because hey, the conclusion was right, so the math must be right too!—which makes it much easier to convince people of something that’s false. and the multiple mentions of “mathematically exact” in these images make it all the worse.)

Women read comics. Anyone at all engaged in social media knows this. Women read comics and are a driving force behind fandom. I think I could call them the driving force behind fandom and put up a convincing argument. Just think about it: what fandoms have driven America crazy in the last decade? Could anyone dissuade me from saying that they were Harry Potter, Twilight and the Hunger Games? “Avatar” may have put butts in theater seats, but you don’t hear about it… ever. No one is immersed in the world of “Avatar” except James Cameron and people who enjoy wearing Na’vi Zentai suits. “The Avengers” was pretty darn huge and, if Tumblr is any indication, a whopping portion of the people driving that fandom online do not possess a Y chromosome. Women engage in fandom to levels that men do not. When women get behind something, their sheer numbers and passion force it into the mainstream. That’s why you can name the actor who plays that werewolf kid in “Twilight” and probably sing at least the chorus to one Justin Bieber song. What do tween boys like? I have no clue. Sports? Probably sports.

Brett White, Comic Book Resources (via wandrinparakeet)

and yet men remain the most marketed demographic for just about everything.

(via ohhoechno)

I’m pretty sure the only men who spend more time thinking about DC than women on Tumblr are the men who actually work there.

(via touchofgrey37)

Now that I think about it, literally every DC fan I ever remember meeting has been a woman.

(via entelechyengine)
fandom-mused-fandom-games:

For my Tumblr Flag/Fandom Games project
See the other fandoms here
Poster made by mewshuji

writingsforwinter:

Rebloggable by request.

kennedyclintonkat:

i did a thing

this obviously isn’t exhaustive - these aren’t all the reasons why these women are feminists, and it’s certainly not all the feminists in pop culture at the moment

if i forgot anyone please put them in the reblogs

obscuruslupa:

theslyestfox:

velvetlovepocket:

“If You Know Someone Who Doesn’t Believe Sexism Exists, Show Them This
Link here: [x]

This is important and it should have millions of more reblogs.

When people ask why this is such a big deal, this is why.

Because people are quiet about their experiences of sexual harassment, of rape, of everyday sexism, because they’re treated with abuse for speaking out about it, it becomes normal and predators are felt more welcome. They feel like this is normal and this is okay. 

By speaking out about it, it makes the predators feel ashamed, it makes someone think twice about making someone feel like they are a sexual object. There is so much power in words. And if we speak up about this, others will speak too. And united, we are more powerful than ever.

It’s not just women. Men have it happen too, and they don’t speak up. They feel like they’ll be laughed at or it’s too uncommon to bother people about it. But no matter who it happens to, it’s not okay.

It is NEVER your fault, not even partially. The person at fault is the rapist, the cat-caller, the creepy man on the Subway feeling you up. And if they aren’t given the blame…then why isn’t it okay for them to continue? They will continue if they feel justified in their actions. And blaming the victim, even in the most minute way, gives the predator that power. Don’t be the one to hand it to them. Fight back. Stand united with your fellow person and make the world stronger.

notaloneintheuniverse:

rainbowrowell:

Jon Stewart vs. People Who Don’t Understand How Birth Control works

There will never come a day where I will not reblog this.